A Note About “Crystal Moon”

Goodreads is an interesting Social Media platform.  It is surprisingly large considering it is only for readers.  As a reader I never found it useful.  I don’t understand the point in announcing to the world what I’m reading and how long it took me to read something.  I talk about what I’m reading with the people I know and that’s pretty much it.  Occasionally I will review something on Goodreads or mark a book “to-read.” As an author, Goodreads is essential for good or ill.  Generally, I find the platform from a writer’s perspective to be bitter-sweet.  Particularly the review system is bare-bones.  Unlike Amazon, Goodreads allows people to put a star rating without a written review.  Based on the ratings “Crystal Moon” has received on Goodreads, I get the sense that it is misunderstood.  However, without feedback that is conjecture.

“Crystal Moon” is an experimental book, it started with a fun idea that a man was a huge Star Wars fan who became paranoid and convinced his wife was a Dark Lady of the Sith.  When I started writing the story I changed the main character’s paranoia about his wife being a Sith to being a witch.  The novel was intended to be a quirky, dark comedy for a niche audience.  It is, an experiment.  It has thriller elements mixed with dark comedy in an Urban Fantasy with a message about the breakdown of communication in marriage. These factors on top of the book being written in journal format make it for a unique audience.  It was something I had fun with and I invite the reader to have fun too by not taking the book too seriously.

So, what does this have to do with Goodreads?  On the social media site, I’ve been getting lukewarm to disappointing ratings.  Frankly, it isn’t surprising due to the reasons I listed above, but here is the catch I do not get feedback from the people who rate the book on Goodreads.  Honestly, if you hate it, think my book is poorly written, or there is a glaring plot-hole I missed, I want to know.  The same goes for positive reviews too.  Do you like a book?  Are you going to take the time to rate it?  Follow through with a written review.  My beta-readers gave valuable feedback on “Crystal Moon” and generally it was positive with some critiques.  The irony of this is that “Crystal Moon” is selling decently well despite these ratings.  Maybe my targeting is off with the book, maybe people are turned off by the quirky plot or the journal format.  If I do not get feedback I do not know.

Another possibility is that people are rating “Crystal Moon” without reading it because it comes up on their “suggested reading” list.  Who knows, but while I stand by my book, I do acknowledge it isn’t for everyone, and that it isn’t above criticism.  So please, feel free to read it and write a review.  It doesn’t have to be glowing, all I ask is that it is thoughtful and constructive.  If you enjoy a fun and quirky light read that has heart but doesn’t take itself seriously, take a look at “Crystal Moon” on Amazon here.

Do we live in an age without self-awareness?

As an author I feel it is my job to pay attention to cultural leanings and norms.  I’ve written before about the politically charged climate we live in.  People have adapted an “us verses them” mentality not just with politics but faith, lack of faith, and even mundane things like movies.  Yes, movies, I’ve seen some impassioned arguments about them on the internet.  With these discussions one primary accusation comes up; the other person or side is a hypocrite.

The truth is, no one likes a hypocrite and we can smell hypocrisy a million miles away in another person or group but struggle to see it in ourselves.  It’s undoubtful that everyone has been a hypocrite before.  I certainly have, everyone I know has been.  That is an inevitable part of being human.  There is a problem when hypocrisy is a pattern or even a lifestyle.

Hypocrisy can evolve to a point where a person is utterly lacking self-awareness.  The problem compounds when such lack of self-awareness spreads throughout a culture like a cancer.  Perhaps I’m cynical but from my perspective this seems to be where we are at in western society.  We see this especially in politics.  If someone from our “team” is guilty of something we look the other way and justify their actions.  However, if the “other side” does the same thing we lose our minds and catastrophize the situation.  The same thing is with religious verses irreligious folks.  The common attitude is that people can have their faith and believe what they will, but they must keep it to themselves.  However, irreligious folks, sometimes flood the internet with comments about how people who believe differently than them are delusional idiots.

There is a surface celebration of diversity in our culture, but rarely are diverse ideas met with approval.  It is the norm to shout down, belittle, and attack those who think differently.  Maybe we should try to understand why someone believes differently instead?  That is much harder.  It also goes against human nature.  It requires an immense amount of empathy, but it is not impossible.  I’m directing these comments as much to myself as anyone reading this.  This is how we become self-aware and do not become what we hate in others.